Protecting and improving the community for the people who live and work here

Please send out these petitions with our request for help from Mayor de Blasio! Note the link to the on-line petition website! Spanish, English and Chinese….

Thanks to Parks Manager Terese Flores and her crew in Sara Roosevelt Park. Beautiful job and just in time for sitting this summer.

Wednesday May 18, 2016

Neighborhood parks across the United States are geared primarily toward younger people, limiting their use by adults and seniors, but surprisingly attract fewer female youth as well, according to a new RAND Corporation study that offers the first national examination of parks, what they offer, who uses them and how they are used.

Although it is critically important for adults and seniors to engage in physical activity, most neighborhood parks have few programmed activities targeted to those groups, researchers found. Adding enhancements such as walking loops and classes geared toward older people could attract many more older users to the parks, according to the study published by the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

The study also found a female gender gap in park use that was most pronounced among children and teens, with females representing only 40 percent of children and 35 percent of teens observed. In addition, females of all ages were less likely to be playing any organized sports and were more sedentary than males.

“Our nation’s public parks have much unmet potential to be a center of physical activity for adults, older Americans and females,” said Dr. Deborah Cohen, the study’s lead author and a senior natural scientist at RAND, a nonprofit research organization. “It appears possible to increase physical activity among adults, seniors and females by making modest investments in facilities and programming.”

More than 9,000 park and recreation departments manage more than 108,000 public parks and 65,000 indoor facilities across the United States.

Neighborhood parks are the backbone of the system, with each location providing diverse facilities such as playgrounds, picnic tables, basketball courts, green space and shade trees. Such parks typically are 2 acres to 20 acres in size and are intended to serve residents living within a 1-mile radius.

The RAND study, the first to compile a national snapshot of public park use, sent observers into 174 neighborhood parks in 25 cities with 100,000 or more residents during the spring and summer of 2014 to document how people used neighborhood parks. They applied methods developed for the study to count users, document characteristics such as age and gender, and record activities, including whether users were engaged in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.

While there was much variation among the locations studied, the results consistently showed that neighborhood park use was especially low among adults, seniors and younger females.

The facilities that generated the most physical activity for adults and seniors were walking loops. Gymnasiums, fitness zones and exercise areas generated the next highest amounts of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity for adults and seniors.

“It’s really sad that so few seniors are using our public parks,” Cohen said. “We need to make changes to attract older people to parks to exercise and stay active, especially with the increasing rates of chronic disease among older people and as our nation’s population grows older.”

The study also found that park use was lower in higher poverty neighborhoods, even though those parks had facilities similar to those in higher-income groups. While the researchers did not collect any information about whether safety issues may influence the trend, they suggest that the disparity in low-income neighborhoods might be overcome by offering more supervised activities and engaging in greater marketing and outreach efforts to people in those neighborhoods.

The study highlights that the nation’s current investment in urban neighborhood parks across the nation is relatively small, especially considering the potential benefits they may yield in improved health. Among the nation’s 100 largest cities, the average annual per capita spending for parks was $73 in 2013 according to the Trust for Public Land, which is less than 1 percent of the amount spent on each person on health care during the same year.

“Relatively modest investments could make parks much more conducive to physical activity for everyone, regardless of age, gender or income level,” Cohen said.

As a part of the study, researchers interviewed senior administrators from the park systems in the cities studied and none routinely measured park use, other than tracking whether people registered for specific programs or sports leagues.

“The fire department or the police department can tell you exactly how many people use their services, but parks and recreation departments have not had any metrics to adequately report who is using their facilities,” Cohen said. “The tools we created for this project are now being used by researchers across the United States and could help park managers better understand who is using their facilities.”

Cities involved with the study were Fresno, Calif., Jacksonville, Fla., Lincoln, Neb., Cleveland, Ohio, Los Angeles, Columbus, Ga., Manchester, N.H., Pittsburgh, Pa., San Francisco, Kansas City, Kan., Albuquerque, N.M., Dallas, Texas, Victorville, Calif., Topeka, Kan., Buffalo, N.Y., Waco, Texas, Pueblo, Colo., Louisville, Ky., New York, Westminster, Colo., Flint, Mich., Yonkers, N.Y., Gainesville, Fla., St. Louis, Mo., and Winston-Salem, N.C.

Support for the study was provided by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Other collaborators included the City Parks Alliance and the Trust for Public Land. Authors of the study are Bing Han, Catherine Nagel, Peter Harnik, Kelly Evenson, Christine Vaughan, Thomas L. McKenzie, Terry Marsh, Stephanie Williamson and Sweatha Katta.

RAND Health is the nation’s largest independent health policy research program, with a broad research portfolio that focuses on health care costs, quality and public health preparedness, among other topics.

http://www.rand.org/news/press/2016/05/18.html

The neighborhood has joined forces to start a petition to save Rivington House.

Rivington House staff and residents have been members of the Sara Roosevelt Coalition since 1994. They were integral to this neighborhood. We are urging the mayor to join other electeds in working to return the building to its rightful occupation: serving this low-income communities most vulnerable members.

From the Lo-Down:

“For weeks, Lower East Side activists tried to get the mayor’s attention on Rivington House. While their initial pleas were ignored, the controversy surrounding the former nursing home has now become a scandal for the mayor who pledged to bridge the divide between the “haves” and the “have-nots” in New York City.”

The petition:

“Rivington House was built by the public for the public to serve its low-income Lower East Side neighborhood.

The building’s deed required it to remain a not-for-profit health care facility in perpetuity, and from 1995-2014, the former public school served as an AIDS/HIV hospice, providing vital end-of-life services to our community’s sick and frail.

But after a series of questionable deals and a secret deed restriction reversal by the city, a group of investors and real estate developers bought the property with the sole intention of turning it into a high-end luxury condo building.

This neighborhood doesn’t need more investments opportunities for the wealthy; we need affordable, supportive homes for our community’s most vulnerable.

It’s time the Mayor stand up for this city’s elderly and sick and stand up to profiteering real estate developers who are tearing apart all of our communities.

Help us win Rivington House back for the community that needs it. Sign this petition and tell Mayor De Blasio to reverse the deed restriction and return Rivington House to the people of the Lower East Side.

Thank you for helping us win this vital building back. ” – Neighbors to Save Rivington House

From the Lo-Down:

“Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer and City Council member Margaret Chin [asking] …for more transparency for changes in deed restrictions.

The bill…is a direct response to the Rivington House fiasco….

…The legislation would create a searchable database of all deed restrictions imposed by the city and require the administration to provide adequate notice to local communities…”

CM’s Ben Kallos and Mark Levine, CB3 chair Gigi Li and CB10 chair Henrietta Lyle were on hand as well.

The Uni Project has launched an eight week residency in Sara D. Roosevelt Park in NYC’s Chinatown.

In partnership with NYC Parks Community Parks Initiative and supported by Leaves of Grass Fund and Green Below 14. Join us at the Hester St Crossing of the park every Thursday 3:30pm-7:30pm through June. (schedule)

DNAinfo: By Allegra Hobbs | May 25, 2016 1:47pm

“The Sara D. Roosevelt Park Coalition since 1994 has been championing efforts to have the city reactivate a Parks Department building on Stanton Street — beginning with the unused restrooms — that has sat as an otherwise derelict storage facility since the 1980s. ”

“… the department remains unmoved in the face of …demands to return the rest of the Stanton House building to community use …. staunchly supported by Community Board 3, according to board chair Gigi Li — arguing the department needs the space for storage. ”

Parks Department uses 3 of 4 Parks buildings in Sara Roosevelt Park for Borough and City-wide usage. Not quite right for this struggling park to carry the rest of the City and Borough’s storage needs?