Basketball, Hanging Out, Fixing Tree Pits, Planting, Pruning, Weeding, Mulching, Playing in Dirt, Tai Chi, Turtles Indoors for Winter, Fish Pond Readied for Winter.
Ai Weiwei Artwork in the Background:
The Hort and Emma Lazarus High School have moved their Green Thumbs to Hester Street and Forsyth Street Side of the Sara Roosevelt Park.
They’ve already made a difference!
Thank you Richard from Audubon NY and Pam from The Hort for organizing an Audubon Bird Walk in Sara Roosevelt Park today.
We saw:
Sharp-shinned Hawk
Rock Pigeon
Mourning Dove
Yellow-bellied Sapsucker
Downy Woodpecker
Hermit Thrush
American Robin
Dark-eyed Junco
White-throated Sparrow
Northern Cardinal
House Sparrow
The Hort provided coffee and donuts and binoculars!
It’s Simple. Community Spaces for the Community.
Reminding all of us how crucial it is for a community to have many local voices in reporting…Without local media vital issues would be buried.
Here are three articles by Allegra Hobbs two on Rivington House and one on the Stanton Building in Sara Roosevelt Park.
She did an important investigative piece on the loss of nursing homes in the lower east side. And much much more.
Thanks Allegra for all you’ve done to keep us honest.
Mayor’s Revisions to Deed Restriction Process ‘Not Enough,’ Community Says
By Allegra Hobbs | July 13, 2016 6:10pm
@AllegraEHobbs
LOWER EAST SIDE — Mayor Bill de Blasio has introduced a bevy of revisions to the city’s process of handling modifications to deed restrictions in an attempt to address concerns arising from the sale ofRivington House, along with pledging money to the Lower East Side community as compensation for the loss.
But community members, who have demanded nothing less than the return of the property, say the changes are not enough.
The mayor’s office on July 8 unleashed a hefty list of proposed policy changes aimed at increasing transparency, oversight and community involvement when it comes to dealing with properties saddled with deed restrictions in the future.
Additionally, the mayor ruled that the $16 million collected by the city for lifting the deed restriction on former nursing home Rivington House that ensured its use as a nonprofit health care facility — a transaction that allowed the building to be sold to a residential development for a condo conversion — will be put towards creating “affordable senior housing” in the Lower East Side.
The city will also “explore” the creation of more nursing home beds in the community, according to the mayor’s office.
But community members, who recently banded together to form a coalition demanding the return of the building to their neighborhood, still are not satisfied, said a member of the newly formed Neighbors to Save Rivington House.
“For me, it is very clear that it’s not enough, and it’s not what we were talking about,” said Melissa Aase, executive director of the University Settlement, an organization providing social services to low-income families, elderly and youth. “We’re going to keep trying to fight for the building to come back to the community.”
The group has launched a petition demanding the city re-implement the deed restriction that was lifted and “return Rivington House to the people of the Lower East Side,” which had gathered more than 1,500 signatures as of Wednesday.
The group is joined by Community Board 3 in issuing the demand. The board in April passed what then-Chairwoman Gigi Li called its “laser-focused resolution” demanding the return of the building, stating the board is “adamant that the sale of the deed restriction be reversed and the complete deed restriction for Rivington House to be reinstated.” The board’s position has not swayed, according to district manager Susan Stetzer.
“The CB did not ask for money to mitigate the loss of Rivington House nursing home beds,” said Stetzer in an email.
The mayor’s office did not respond to repeated requests for comment regarding the community’s demand, and did not respond to repeated requests for clarification on how the $16 million will be allocated within the community.
The proposed policy changes are in response to widespread outrage following the February sale of Rivington House — for decades a nonprofit health care facility for HIV/AIDS patients — to residential developer Slate Property Group, which now plans on putting condos in the building.
A handful of city, state and federal watchdogs are probing the transactions, questioning whether the city’s process for removing deed restrictions is stringent enough.
Comptroller Scott Stringer has demanded transparency from the city, saying the public has “a right to know how these deed restrictions are being managed and whether taxpayers and our communities are being protected.” The investigation is ongoing, said a rep for the comptroller, along with investigations from the attorney general’s office and the city’s own Department of Investigation.
The mayor’s proposed changes — slated to be put into action in the coming months — require the city use “legally binding language” while modifying deed restrictions that would prevent the property from being used for an alternate purpose.
The legislation would also change the way deed restriction modifications are financially compensated — while under the current law, owners are charged 25 percent of the property’s market value for a modification — as was the case with Rivington House — these requests will now be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
Greater transparency and oversight will also be instated under the policy changes — the Department of Citywide Administrative Services, the agency tasked with overseeing deed restriction modifications, will now present any request for a deed modification to a committee made up of a handful of city representatives.
Additionally, the city will work out a new process for notifying the community and gathering feedback while considering a request for a deed restriction modification — while previously the local community board was not notified or involved in the public hearing process, the city going forward would work in partnership with the boards to ensure community engagement.
Elected officials have offered tepid support of the revisions following the mayor’s announcement, with Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer calling the policy changes a “step in the right direction,” noting “the Rivington House’s value to the community far exceeded $16 million” and that there is much work to be done to create needed nursing home beds in the community.
Councilwoman Margaret Chin, while congratulating the mayor on the revisions, said she will continue to fight alongside the community for the return of the property.
“While I will continue to explore every option to take back Rivington House, I thank Mayor de Blasio for taking these important first steps to make this community whole again,” Chin said in a statement.
According to Aase, the Neighbors to Save Rivington House coalition is expected to release a statement reaffirming its position in the near future.
City Hid Rivington House Memos From Investigators, DOI Says
By Allegra Hobbs | July 27, 2016 8:55am | Updated July 27, 2016 4:27pm
House to the community.View Full Caption
DNAinfo/Allegra Hobbs
MANHATTAN — City officials tried to hide evidence from investigators that showed City Hall knew about a plan to turn Rivington House into condos long before the sale went through — and only agreed to hand over thousands of pages of evidence after the Department of Investigation threatened to sue, officials said Tuesday.
The city’s Law Department refused to cooperate with DOI investigators probing the controversial deed restriction on Rivington House — even redacting or marking damning documents as “not relevant” in order to withhold them from investigators, according to a DOI report of the city’s mishandling of the issue.
DOI Inspector General Jodi Franzese on July 21 sent a letter to Corporation Counsel Zachary Carter demanding the release of all relevant documents, as well as access to computers used by city officials — requests Law had continually rebuffed, said Franzese.
“DOI has the exclusive prerogative to determine how it conducts its investigations and what information is relevant to its investigations. Neither City Hall, Law, nor any other City agency or official is entitled to interfere or refuse to cooperate with a DOI investigation or determine what material is relevant to that investigation,” Franzese wrote.
The city and the mayor have repeatedly insisted they had no prior knowledge of the deal before developers bought the property from the city, then turned around and sold the nonprofit nursing home for HIV/AIDS patients to be converted into private condos.
But the DOI found the Law Department actively attempted to thwart the investigation by deliberately holding back relevant documents — including a memo weighing the pros and cons of lifting the deed restriction on Rivington House, which revealed city officials knew about a possible condo conversion early on, as first reported by theDaily News.
The city gave the DOI blank pages in place of the memo, according to the letter, and only provided the non-redacted version when specifically asked for it by DOI, the letter read.
“This Memo provided vital information showing that City Hall was involved in the decision-making process on Rivington House and is therefore directly relevant to City Hall’s involvement in the Rivington matter,” the letter states. “If DOI had not determined through other means that the document existed, and had not requested that particular document, Law would not have provided it.”
“This was not Law’s decision to make, and it wrongly withheld the document.”
STORY CONTINUES BENEATH MEMO
The Law Department also withheld a memo about lifting a deed restriction on the Dance Theatre of Harlem, again claiming the document was irrelevant to the investigation, the letter states — a claim that was “innappopriate and incorrect,” according to DOI officials.
Days after DOI’s letter threatening legal action, the Law Department finally agreed to hand over all requested documents, DOI said.
On Tuesday, the department also gave DOI access to the hard drives of Mayor Bill de Blasio and other City Hall staffers that they’d refused to turn over earlier in the investigation.
“I am pleased that the Law Department decided to comply with the law,” DOI Commissioner Peters said in a statement. “And, I am proud of the DOI staff who doggedly pursued access to these records so DOI can fully investigate the matter at hand.”
Meanwhile, Mayor Bill de Blasio on Wednesday brushed off the furor surrounding the city’s mishandling of Rivington House, calling media coverage of the investigation “overheated and off the mark” and sarcastically comparing the scandal to Watergate,the Daily News has reported.
“This is probably bigger than Watergate,” he said at a panel in Philadelphia, the Daily News reported, before going on to assert that the investigation would ultimately find his administration blameless.
“It’s all going to show the exact same thing at the end, that things were handled appropriately,” he said.
The Department of Investigation is still reviewing the thousands of pages of documents provided by the Law Department, according to a representative.
The city’s Law Department on Wednesday afternoon responded that DOI’s claims it had withheld documents are “false” and that the department had been fully cooperative — the Law Department had promptly notified DOI of the existence of the Rivington memo, it claimed, and then produced the un-redacted version of the memo immediately upon request.
As for the memo on the Harlem property, the Law Department only stated that it had provided the memo to DOI on May 3, 2016, which does not contradict DOI’s claim, and did not comment on whether the document had been initially redacted or was clearly marked for DOI’s review.
The Law Department further stated that DOI had requested “unprecedented access” to its computers, “far beyond what would be necessary ot locate any documents relevant to their investigation of the Rivington transaction,” and that DOI had ultimately agreed to use certain search terms while searching the computer databases.
The Department of Investigation did not immediately respond to a request for further comment.
And on Stanton Building
Sara D. Roosevelt Park Still in Need of Public Restrooms, Locals Say
By Allegra Hobbs | May 25, 2016 1:47pm
The Parks Department building on Stanton Street is currently being used for storage.
LOWER EAST SIDE — For more than two decades, those who live and work around Sara. D Roosevelt Park have been begging the city’s Parks Department for adequate public restrooms — but little progress has been made, according to advocates of the green space, and the lack of facilities is taking its toll.
The Sara D. Roosevelt Park Coalition since 1994 has been championing efforts to have the city reactivate a Parks Department building on Stanton Street — beginning with the unused restrooms — that has sat as an otherwise derelict storage facility since the 1980s.
And the coalition’s president has seen firsthand the area’s dire need for restrooms — she has even cleaned up human feces in the park, she says, where the homeless population is left with no alternative.
“We have put people in a pretty messed up position which pits them against the neighborhood, and I don’t think that’s right,” said Kay Webster, who in 2013 penned an opinion piece for the Lo-Down outlining the importance of the building to the community.
“It’s been a very long time,” she continued. “We definitely need that building.”
And it’s not just the neighborhood’s homeless who suffer from the lack of facilities. Jennifer Marcus, who helps maintain the park’s M’Finda Kalunga Garden, says she and her fellow gardeners often go searching for nearby coffee shops, or else go to the Whole Foods on E. Houston Street, where they are asked to buy something in order to use the restroom.
“There is no bathroom anywhere,” she said. “People are always coming and asking — people with kids, tourists from everywhere — and there are no facilities for the kids playing basketball and soccer.”
While the restrooms at the nearby BRC Senior Services Center are available to gardeners on the weekdays, the center is closed on the weekend, said Marcus, and is not open to other users of the park.
The park, which spans over half a mile from E. Houston Street to Canal Street, currently has one available public restroom on Hester Street, which is open daily, 9 a.m. to 7 p.m — the facility sits near the southern end of the sprawling park, leaving a void on the northern end, said Webster.
A facility on Broome Street is in need of major reconstruction due to a sewage issue, according to a Parks Department representative. The Lo-Down last year reported on an incident in which a department worker was hospitalized, reportedly due to fecal fumes, after someone had jammed a hoodie into a toilet when the building was left open overnight.
Work on the Broome Street building is expected to kick off by the end of the year, according to the rep.
Meanwhile, the limited hours of the Hester Street building fail to serve the homeless community, and in turn fail to serve the surrounding community, Webster said.
The solution, Webster said, is to reactive the Stanton Street building, to have at least one facility open 24 hours a day, and to hire staff members paid to supervise the facilities in order to prevent misuse.
After years of fighting for adequate facilities, the Parks Department is moving toward making at least some of the suggested upgrades a reality. The staff bathroom in the Stanton Street storehouse will be converted into public bathrooms, thanks to a collective $1 million donation from Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer and Councilwoman Margaret Chin — the renovation is currently in the design phase, according to a parks rep.
Still, the department has been unable to estimate a timeline for the project, according to a representative for Chin’s office. And from Webster’s perspective, having fought for the conversion for years, the conversion is inching along at a painstaking pace.
Meanwhile, the department remains unmoved in the face of locals’ demands to return the rest of the Stanton House building to community use as a youth center — a demand that remains among the park coalition’s goals, and has been staunchly supported by Community Board 3, according to board chair Gigi Li — arguing the department needs the space for storage.
The coalition has suggested an alternative storage site under the Williamsburg Bridge, said Webster, which she says has been discussed with Parks Department reps at monthly coalition meetings. A rep for the department, however, said it is not in conversation about moving the storage.
“I’ve tried to be diplomatic and work with parks,” said Webster. “I don’t know what it’s going to take.”
https://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20160525/lower-east-side/sara-d-roosevelt-park-still-need-of-public-restrooms-locals-say
“Please join our campaign to ask Mayor de Blasio to call the meeting he promised Council Member Chin inviting China Vanke to meet at City Hall to request Rivington House be returned to the community. China Vanke’s public profile specifically states its core values:
“Built around principles, China Vanke is featured with putting morals and ethics before profits. … its success depends on its commitment to core values, resistance to temptations, and fair return based on its professionalism… strives to be… the most respected company of society through self-regulation, enhanced transparency…”
We assume that would apply here where the building was sold out from under a vulnerable constituency – our elders – by an entity that did not put “morals and ethics before profits”
UPROSE is shipping necessary materials requested by on the ground organizations in PR through a Greenpeace Arctic boat. UPROSE’s shipment leaves NYC this Friday November 3rd!
Drop off items at GOLES to get them on the boat to Puerto Rico.
Needed ONLY!!:
Food Seeds (non-GMO preferred), Water Filters, Tarps, Solar Powered Devices, Bikes & Bike Parts, Work Boots, Work Gloves, Face Masks, Saw Blades.
LES drop off GOLES 169 Avenue B between 10th/11th Streets NY NY
Thursday November 2nd 10am-6pm
We held our annual Halloween yesterday with visitors from the neighborhood and from all over the world – as is the beauty of NYC.
We had Muslims, Catholics, Protestants, Jews, Buddhists and atheists (and others). Languages ‘spoken’: French, Spanish, Mandarin, Cantonese, English, and American Sign Language.
In the words of our terrific organizer Jane Barrer, Co-Chair of M’Finda Kalunga Garden:
“Today we had a sweet Halloween party for the neighborhood children…and in the light of the dreadful events that also took place today it was wonderful to see innocent little ones, gentle parents, giggling girls and boys, helpful teenagers and, as always, the awesome gardeners of M’Finda Kalunga who never stop giving of themselves.”
We were in the M’Finda Kalunga Garden celebrating Halloween when we heard.
Tonight our thoughts are with those who lost their lives today and with their families and friends.
Two poems. Barbara Kingsolvers written after 9/11 and Alice Walker on where we head after this.
A Pure, High Note of Anguish by Barbara Kingsolver
TUCSON — I want to do something to help right now.
But I can’t give blood (my hematocrit always runs too
low), and I’m too far away to give anybody shelter or
a drink of water. I can only give words. My verbal
hemoglobin never seems to wane, so words are what I’ll
offer up in this time that asks of us the best
citizenship we’ve ever mustered. I don’t mean to say I
have a cure. Answers to the main questions of the
day–Where was that fourth plane headed? How did they
get knives through security?–I don’t know any of
that.
I have some answers, but only to the questions nobody
is asking right now but my 5-year old. Why did all
those people die when they didn’t do anything
wrong? Will it happen to me? Is this the worst thing
that’s ever happened? Who were those children cheering
that they showed for just a minute, and why
were they glad? Please, will this ever, ever happen to
me?
There are so many answers, and none: It is desperately
painful to see people die without having done anything
to deserve it, and yet this is how lives end nearly
always. We get old or we don’t, we get cancer,
we starve, we are battered, we get on a plane thinking
we’re going home but never make it. There are
blessings and wonders and horrific bad luck and no
guarantees.
We like to pretend life is different from that, more
like a game we can actually win with the right
strategy, but it isn’t. And, yes, it’s the worst
thing that’s happened, but only this week. Two years
ago, an earthquake in Turkey killed 17,000 people in a
day, babies and mothers and businessmen, and not
one of them did a thing to cause it. The November
before that, a hurricane hit Honduras and Nicaragua
and killed even more, buried whole villages and
erased family lines and even now, people wake up there
empty-handed.
Which end of the world shall we talk about? Sixty
years ago, Japanese airplanes bombed Navy boys who
were sleeping on ships in gentle Pacific waters.
Three and a half years later, American planes bombed a
plaza in Japan where men and women were going to work,
where schoolchildren were playing, and more humans
died at once than anyone thought possible. Seventy
thousand in a minute. Imagine. Then twice that many
more, slowly, from the inside.
There are no worst days, it seems. Ten years ago,
early on a January morning, bombs rained down from the
sky and caused great buildings in the city of
Baghdad to fall down–hotels, hospitals, palaces,
buildings with mothers and soldiers inside–and here
in the place I want to love best, I had to watch
people cheering about it. In Baghdad, survivors shook
their fists at the sky and said the word “evil.” When
many lives are lost all at once, people gather
together and say words like “heinous” and “honor” and
“revenge,” presuming to make this awful moment stand
apart somehow from the ways people die a little
each day from sickness or hunger. They raise up their
compatriots’ lives to a sacred place–we do this, all
of us who are human–thinking our own citizens
to be more worthy of grief and less willingly risked
than lives on other soil. But broken hearts are not
mended in this ceremony, because, really, every life
that ends is utterly its own event–and also in some
way it’s the same as all others, a light going out
that ached to burn longer. Even if you never had the
chance to love the light that’s gone, you miss it. You
should.
You bear this world and everything that’s wrong with
it by holding life still precious, each time, and
starting over. And those children dancing in the
street? That is the hardest question. We would rather
discuss trails of evidence and whom to stamp out, even
the size and shape of the cage we might put ourselves
in to stay safe, than to mention the fact that our
nation is not universally beloved; we are also
despised. And not just by “The Terrorist,” that lone,
deranged non-man in a bad photograph whose opinion we
can clearly dismiss, but by ordinary people in
many lands. Even by little boys–whole towns full of
them it looked like–jumping for joy in school shoes
and pilled woolen sweaters.
There are a hundred ways to be a good citizen, and one
of them is to look finally at the things we don’t want
to see. In a week of terrifying events, here is one
awful, true thing that hasn’t much been mentioned:
Some people believe our country needed to learn how to hurt
in this new way. This is such a large lesson, so
hatefully, wrongfully taught, but many people before
us have learned honest truths from wrongful deaths. It
still may be within our capacity of mercy to say this
much is true: We didn’t really understand how it felt
when citizens were buried alive in Turkey or Nicaragua
or Hiroshima. Or that night in Baghdad. And we
haven’t cared enough for the particular brothers and
mothers taken down a limb or a life at a time, for
such a span of years that those little, briefly
jubilant boys have grown up with twisted hearts. How
could we keep raining down bombs and selling weapons,
if we had? How can our president still use that word
“attack” so casually, like a move in a checker game,
now that we have awakened to see that word in our own
newspapers, used like this: Attack on America.
Surely, the whole world grieves for us right now. And
surely it also hopes we might have learned, from the
taste of our own blood, that every war is both
won and lost, and that loss is a pure, high note of
anguish like a mother singing to any empty bed. The
mortal citizens of a planet are praying right
now that we will bear in mind, better than ever
before, that no kind of bomb ever built will
extinguish hatred.
“Will this happen to me?” is the wrong question, I’m
sad to say. It always was.
Turning Madness into Flowers -Alice Walker
It is my thought that the ugliness of war, of gratuitous violence in all its hideous forms, will cease very soon to appeal to even the most insulated of human beings. It will be seen by all for what it is: a threat to our well-being, to our survival as a species, and to our happiness. The brutal murder of our common mother, while we look on like frightened children, will become an unbearable visceral suffering that we will refuse to bear. We will abandon the way of the saw, the jackhammer and the drill.
Of bombs, too.
As religious philosophies that espouse or excuse violence reveal their true poverty of hope for humankind, there will be a great awakening, already begun, about what is of value in life.
We will turn our madness into flowers as a way of moving completely beyond all previous and current programming of how we must toe the familiar line of submission and fear, following orders given us by miserable souls who, somehow have managed to almost completely control us. We will discover something wonderful: that the world really does not enjoy following psychopaths, those who treat the earth our mother, as if she is wrong, and must be corrected, in as sadistic and domineering a way as that of a drunken husband who kills his wife.
The world – the animals, including us humans – wants to be engaged in something entirely other, seeing, and delighting in, the stark wonder of where we are: This place. This gift. This paradise.
We want to follow joy.
And we shall.
The madness, of course, for each one of us, will have to be sorted out.
Add “revitalization” in low-income communities and “we are for affordable housing – just not here” in high-income communities.
